What is more rational and factually supported explanation for the diversity of life; evolution or creationism?

OK look. If you actually take the time to look at both sides then there really is no reason to ask this question. Creationism is based on a book for which there is NO proof. No matter the explanation given by this book, it is not based in any sort of science. It is not rational thought to believe that this is a science. To be considered a science you must have varied outside sources and have the ability to be wrong and adjust your hypotheses. The bible is a list of absolutes and not open for change or debate, therefore, science(evolution) is the only way to rationally describe how life has changed on this planet.